Piglet castration and swine welfare: a painful procedure | Dechra UK

Describing dairy inflammation symptoms

Attitudes towards farm animal pain and its management have considerably evolved in Europe in the last decade.

However, much remains to be done in terms of swine welfare, especially with regards to painful nevertheless commonly performed husbandry procedures such as piglet castration and tail docking.

Traditionally used to improve pork meat quality, piglet surgical castration is still commonly carried out in Europe, often without the provision of any pain relief or anaesthesia, even though it is commonly acknowledged that this procedure causes acute pain. Unsurprisingly, piglet surgical castration has been under public scrutiny in the last few years, raising significant animal welfare concerns.

What is the current situation on piglet castration in Europe?

How can vets and farmers work collaboratively to ensure welfare standards are properly met with regards to piglet castration, while still being pragmatic and easy to implement both for pig farmers and vets?

Piglet surgical castration: why, how?

Surgical castration is an invasive and painful husbandry procedure commonly performed in piglets before the age of seven days.

This standard practice is performed in most European countries. Technically, it consists of a scrotal incision, the blunt dissection of testicular tissue from the surrounding fascia, and the hyper-extension of the spermatic cord until it spontaneously ruptures or is cut1. The severing of the spermatic cord is thought to be the most painful part of the surgery for pigs2.

Piglet surgical castration is primarily used to reduce the occurrence of “boar taint”, an unpleasant odour often found in meat from entire male pigs, caused by androstenone (male sex hormone), skatole and indole (both are produced respectively in the intestine from the breakdown of tryptophan) which are deposited in the fat tissue3. Pork meat displaying boar taint is not suitable for human consumption. Methods of boar taint detection vary, although the human nose detection remains the most frequently used practice.

Surgical castration is also used to prevent undesired sexual and aggressive behaviour in male pigs. Castrated males are less aggressive and easier to manage4. In addition to being a painful procedure, surgical castration often results in increased feed costs and increased fat content of the carcass5.

Piglet castration: a painful procedure

According to the Federation of Veterinarians of Europe, castration of pigs without anaesthesia or post-operative analgesia conflicts with current animal welfare and ethics best practice6. Pig castration is a painful, invasive procedure that causes prolonged pain7 and is therefore detrimental to pig welfare.

Surgical castration leads to behavioural changes, which may be indicators of pain7,8. Pain-related behaviours associated with piglet castration include stress vocalisation (mainly associated with the pulling and severing of the spermatic cord1,2,8), as well as spasms, stiffness, prostration, trembling, especially for the first few hours after castration9.

Piglets also display behaviour changes related to pain such as tail wagging, huddling up, and rump scratching in the days following the procedure1,8,9. Surgical castration can also lead to physiological changes such as the activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and of the sympathetic nervous system9.

How to mitigate pain caused by piglet surgical castration

Current pain reduction strategies include the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) prior to castration, as well as the use of local anaesthetics, and general anaesthesia. Licensed medicines to use for anaesthesia and analgesia for pig castration are limited. Furthermore, anaesthetic and analgesic protocols need to be cost-effective, practical, efficacious, safe (for the pig, the farmer and/or the vet and the environment) and produce minimum stress and pain.

Meloxicam, ketoprofen and flunixin are the most commonly used NSAIDs, although some studies suggest that their effectiveness in alleviating pain during surgical castration is questionable 10. The use of NSAIDs administered prior to the surgery seems to have an effect on post-operative pain, suggested by a reduction in pain-related behaviours post-surgically10,11 (rump scratching, tail wagging). More specifically, the use of meloxicam prior to piglet castration seems to result in less pain-related behaviours afterwards, whether a local anaesthetic has been used or not7,12.

Procaine is the only licensed drug to be used for pig castration10. Lidocaine does not have a maximum residue limit (MRL) and is therefore not allowed for use in food-producing animals in Europe; however, some countries like France allow its use for piglet surgical castration. It is worth noting that the injection of a local anaesthetic in the scrotum and testicles can cause additional pain and distress to piglets. When given a local anaesthetic, piglets exhibit a significant reduction in escape behaviour during castration7,13. The use of topical anaesthetics (short or long acting) on the severed spermatic cords after castration and on scrotal incisions does not seem to result in a change of pain-related behaviours (bottom scooting, huddling)14. Using anaesthetics seem to be beneficial to piglets during surgical castration (demonstrable reduction in pain perception and stress response); however, without a combined use of an analgesic, piglets seem to experience pain after the procedure10,15,16. General anaesthesia does not seem to result in any difference in pain-related behaviour after castration14, 17, and is not commonly used for practical reasons, except in some countries such as Germany.

So, according to research, anaesthesia alone prevents pain during surgery, but not after, while analgesia alone mitigates pain after surgery, but not during it5.

Fattening of male boars and immunocastration: alternatives to piglet surgical castration

There are several alternatives to surgical castration.

Raising entire male pigs is traditionally used in some countries such as Spain, Portugal, Ireland and the United Kingdom. From a welfare point of view, there is no castration, so no pain nor stress experienced by animals. There is no additional workload for the pig farmers either.

However, uncastrated pigs can display aggressive and sexual behaviours, detrimental to their welfare18. Feed efficiency and carcass quality are better than in surgically castrated pigs, however the meat quality is lower18 (presence of boar taint, reduced intramuscular fat content and reduced saturation of the fat). One way to address the presence of boar taint could be to slaughter entire males at a lower weight; however, this approach is not used currently for obvious economic reasons6. Some slaughterhouses have implemented “Human Nose Scores” based on recording boar taint after heating19. Also, research suggests the possibility of a genetic solution to decrease boar taint to abandon castration3,18,19. As a matter of fact, as androstenone and skatole have moderate to high heritability, it is technically possible to genetically select against these compounds. Although this method seems promising, implementing such genetic selections strategies has a cost. Modifications of diet and environmental conditions could also decrease boar taint3.

Alternatives to surgical castration also include immunological castration, often referred as immunocastration, which aims is to delay the onset of puberty.  Immunocastration is not a hormonal treatment, meaning there are no hormonal residues issues, but stimulates the pig’s immune system to produce antibodies inhibiting testes function. The effect is temporary. It has been permitted in Europe since 2009. It requires two injections at least four weeks apart during the fattening phase of pigs, the second dose being given four to five weeks before slaughter20.

Some countries, such as Belgium, display higher percentage of immunocastrated male pigs. Immunocastration prevents the occurrence of boar taint, removes the pain that would have been associated to a surgical castration, and prevents stress-related aggressive and sexual behaviours in male pigs5,20. In this aspect, immunocastration clearly displays obvious welfare advantages compared to surgical castration. However, immunocastrated male pigs can sometimes display aggressive behaviour before the second injection, as immunocastration is only effective after the second vaccination18.

 

1Ison SH, Clutton RE, Di Giminiani P, Rutherford KM. A Review of Pain Assessment in Pigs. Front Vet Sci. 2016 Nov 28;3:108.

2Taylor A, Weary D. Vocal responses of piglets to castration: identifying procedural sources of pain. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2000) 70:17–26.

3Duarte DAS, Schroyen M, Mota RR, Vanderick S, Gengler N. Recent genetic advances on boar taint reduction as an alternative to castration: a review. J Appl Genet. 2021 Feb;62(1):137-150.

4EFSA. Welfare aspects of the castration of piglets. EFSA J (2004) 91:1–18

5Bonneau M, Weiler U. Pros and Cons of Alternatives to Piglet Castration: Welfare, Boar Taint, and Other Meat Quality Traits. Animals (Basel). 2019 Oct 30;9(11):884.

6Position paper on pig castration. Federation of Veterinarians of Europe. February 2019. ahttps://fve.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/fve_09_040_castration_pigs_2009.pdf. Accessed September 30th 2024.

7Hansson M, Lundeheim N, Nyman G, Johansson G. Effect of local anaesthesia and/or analgesia on pain responses induced by piglet castration. Acta Vet Scand (2011) 53:34–43.

8Garcia A, Sutherland M, Vasquez G, Quintana A, Thompson G, Willis J, Chandler S, Niure K, McGlone J. An investigation of the use of ethyl chloride and meloxicam to decrease the pain associated with a single or double incision method of castration in piglets. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 28;4:1113039.

9Hay M, Vulin A, Génin S, Sales P, Prunier A. Assessment of pain induced by castration in piglets: behavioral and physiological responses over the subsequent 5 days. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2003) 82(3):201–18.

10De Briyne N, Berg C, Blaha T, Temple D. Pig castration: will the EU manage to ban pig castration by 2018? Porcine Health Manag. 2016 Dec 20;2:29.

11von Borell E, Baumgartner J, Giersing M, Jäggin N, Prunier A, Tuyttens FA, Edwards SA. Animal welfare implications of surgical castration and its alternatives in pigs. Animal. 2009 Nov;3(11):1488-96.

12Keita A, Pagot E, Prunier A, Guidarini C. Pre-emptive meloxicam for postoperative analgesia in piglets undergoing surgical castration. Vet Anaesth Analg (2010) 37:367–74.

13Leidig M, Hertrampf B, Failing K, Schumann A, Reiner G. Pain and discomfort in male piglets during surgical castration with and without local anaesthesia as determined by vocalisation and defence behaviour. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2009) 116:174–8.

14Sutherland MA, Davis BL, Brooks TA, McGlone JJ. Physiology and behavior of pigs before and after castration: effects of two topical anesthetics. Animal (2010) 4:2071–9.

15Horn T, Marx G, von Borell E. Verhalten von Ferkeln während der Kastration mit und ohne Lokalanästhesie [Behavior of piglets during castration with and without local anesthesia]. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1999 Jul;106(7):271-4. German. PMID: 10481369.

16Kluivers-Poodt M, Hopster H, Spoolder H. Castration under anaesthesia and/ or analgesia in commercial pig production. Report 85. Animal science Group 2007. Wageningen-UR, The Netherlands.

17Van Beirendonck S, Driessen B, Verbeke G, Geers R. Behavior of piglets after castration with or without carbon dioxide anesthesia. J Anim Sci (2011) 89:3310–7.

18Weiler U, Font-I-Furnols M, Tomasevič I, Bonneau M. Alternatives to Piglet Castration: From Issues to Solutions. Animals (Basel). 2021 Apr 7;11(4):1041.

19Backus G, Higuera M, Juul N, Nalon E. De Briyne N. Second Progress Report 2015–2017 on the European Declaration on Alternatives to Surgical Castration of Pigs. Expert Group on ending surgical castration of pigs. Brussels, May 2018.

20Werner D, Baldinger L, Bussemas R, Büttner S, Weißmann F, Ciulu M, Mörlein J, Mörlein D. Early Immunocastration of Pigs: From Farming to Meat Quality. Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 25;11(2):298.

Downloads 

keyboard_arrow_up